Why Information Theory for Memetics?

Why Information Theory for Memetics?

Most memetics research treats memes as vaguely-defined “units of cultural transmission” without rigorous formalization. Information theory provides the missing mathematical framework.

The Problem with Current Memetics

1. No quantitative predictions — We can say “memes spread” but can’t predict which ones or why
2. No measurement — What units measure “memetic fitness”?
3. No channel model — Human communication is treated as perfect transmission
4. No error analysis — We ignore that ideas get garbled in retelling

What Information Theory Provides

Shannon’s framework offers:

Concept	Application to Memetics
Entropy	Measure of uncertainty/information in a meme
Channel capacity	Limits of human-to-human transmission
Compression	Why short phrases beat long explanations
Error correction	How memes survive imperfect retelling
Rate-distortion	Tradeoff between fidelity and transmissibility

The Key Insight

Human communication channels are noisy and bandwidth-limited. Successful memes are those optimized for transmission through these constraints—not necessarily those with the most “truth content.”

This explains why:

• Proverbs outlast academic papers
• Slogans beat policy documents
• Catchphrases survive centuries

Mathematical Foundation

We can formalize meme transmission as:

$$M_{received} = f(M_{transmitted}, N_{channel}, C_{human})$$

Where:

• $M$ = meme content
• $N$ = noise (misunderstanding, forgetting, paraphrasing)
• $C$ = channel capacity (attention span, working memory)

The research question becomes: What properties of $M$ maximize successful reconstruction given fixed $N$ and $C$?

Why This Matters

If we can identify the information-theoretic properties of successful memes, we can:

1. Predict which ideas will spread
2. Design more transmissible versions of important truths
3. Identify why some truths systematically fail to spread (they may be “structurally anti-memetic”)

---

Next: The Compression Hypothesis